Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government. Show all posts

U.S. lawmakers want to make smart city projects less risky


Smart city projects have plenty of on-paper advantages, but city leaders are keen to remain in the good books of residents and broken promises, lack of city funds, and failed projects don’t make a good resume.
It’s part of the reason we aren’t seeing much smart city investment outside of hubs like San Francisco, New York City, and Austin, Texas, where city planners can afford to spend a few million on projects.
See Also: Latin America smart city market to grow 19% by 2020
U.S. lawmakers want that to change and are looking to create a bill that gives city planners more smart city legroom, hopefully inspiring city leaders to embark on missions to revive their city centers.
Democratic Rep. Suzan DelBene has said she and a team of like-minded individuals are working on a bill to improve pilot programs for cities, encouraging public and private investment and reducing the hardships for city leaders that fail to achieve the project goals.
“We have draft legislation as well on smart communities that we are working on in conjunction with folks in the Senate so that we have grant programs and understand pilot programs so we get best practices” said DelBene at an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation event in Philadelphia on Wednesday.

Lawmakers building on recent smart city successes

The success of the Department of Transportation’s Smart City Challenge, where the government awarded the winning city $40 million and Paul Allen’s investment firm Vulcan gave an additional $10 million, may lead to more federal funding and grants for smart city projects.
Even though Columbus, Ohio was declared the winning city, city leaders in Denver, Colorado, Portland, Orlando and San Francisco were surprised by the level of private sector interest in smart city projects and the enthusiasm from the public for new upgrades to the city.
Some of the city leaders even called for the projects to continue regardless of the result, receiving enough private sector funding to start building smart systems.
DelBene sees this as an opportunity to push smart city projects even further, by ensuring that regardless of private sector investment, the government will be there to back projects and offer advice.

What role will the government play in IoT?



As the Internet of Things (IoT) market begins to boom, we are bound to see the government take a more active role in investment and policing what is right and wrong in the industry.


That’s what an April 6 notice on the Federal Register by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) seems to suggest, asking for all parties involved in IoT to discuss with the administration about the evolution of IoT and shifts in global economies from the new technology.
See Also: Will IIoT Bolster Industrial Automation Investments? 
“NTIA seeks broad input from all interested stakeholders — including the private industry, researchers, academia and civil society — on the potential benefits and challenges of [Internet of Things] technologies and what role, if any, the U.S. government should play in this area,” said NTIA in the notice.


While it reads civilly enough, the U.S. government has shown a lack of enthusiasm for major projects like commercial drones, which we shut down by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2015.
That might worry IoT stakeholders that want to see the market grow unhindered. If new regulations or subsidies are set in place, it might change the dynamics of the market drastically.



Government trying to get a handle on IoT

Federal Times explains that the comments will be added to a green paper, which will be given to the government to “identify key issues impacting deployment of these technologies, highlight potential benefits and challenges and identify possible roles for the federal government in fostering the advancement of IoT technologies in partnership with the private sector.”

While IoT has been around for a decade now, it has only gained its bearings in the last three years. The growth in the consumer sector, with devices like Nest’s thermostat, Philips Hue, and Amazon Dash Button selling well, has brought more interest from all across the industry, which Gartner claims will balloon to 26 billion IoT devices by 2020.
It doesn’t appear to be a market desperate for government intervention, though no doubt some will argue for and against government assistance.

Binge Drinking Rates Lower in States With Strict Alcohol Policies

Binge Drinking Rates Lower in States With Strict Alcohol PoliciesBeer

States with lower rates of binge drinking have stronger policies toward alcohol, a new study suggests.
This is the first study to relate alcohol policies within each U.S. state to the levels and likelihood of binge drinking in adults.
"We found that states with stronger and more effective alcohol policies had less binge drinking than states with weaker alcohol policies," said study researcher Dr. Timothy Naimi, an associate professor of medicine at Boston University's Schools of Medicine and of Public Health.
"Most states could be doing a lot better to address a leading cause of preventable deaths," Naimi said.
Alcohol is the third-leading cause of preventable death in the United States, after smoking and the combined effects of over-eating and inactivity, Naimi said.
There's a slight uptick in binge drinking during the holiday season, Naimi said. But it's a serious problem among adults year-round, responsible for more than half of the estimated 80,000 alcohol-attributable deaths that occur each year in the United States.

 
In the study, the researchers defined binge drinking as five or more drinks for men, and four or more drinks for women on one occasion during the last 30 days, which is the same definition used by a monthly health survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The findings were published online Tuesday in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Alcohol Policies

To find out whether varying policy environments in states across the country accounted for differences in binge drinking, researchers asked a panel of experts to rate the alcohol policies in 50 states and the District of Columbia. These experts rated the number and effectiveness of alcohol policies in each state, and the degree to which the policies had been implemented between 2000 and 2010.
For example, the experts evaluated state policies aimed at reducing binge drinking, such as drunk driving laws and taxes on alcohol sales, and whether the state limited the number of retail outlets that sell alcohol beverages in a given area. They also looked at whether states restricted the days and hours of alcohol sales at stores, bars and restaurants, and if they held retailers responsible for problems caused by selling alcohol to underage drinkers or visibly drunk customers.
These policy ratings, along with data on the statewide prevalence of adult binge drinking, were used to calculate an alcohol policy score in each state on a yearly basis over the 10-year study period.

Policies Matter

This analysis found that states with stronger policy scores had lower amounts of binge drinking.
For example, in 2008, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, Utah, Kansas and Washington had strong policies and low rates of binge drinking. Meanwhile, the states with the weakest alcohol policy environments, such as South Dakota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana, who ranked in the bottom quarter of states, had higher binge drinking rates. In fact, their rates were one-third higher compared with the top quarter of states with the strongest policies.
The researchers looked at single years for their comparisons, because states' policies about alcohol change slowly, Naimi said.
These findings held true even after researchers took into account other factors that could also contribute to the amount of drinking seen within a state's population, such as its residents' age, sex, race, income and religious composition.
Almost half the states' scores were lower than 50% of the maximum score, so there's lots of room for improvement, Naimi said.
Alcohol-related policies can play an important part in helping states reduce the health and social problems, and economic costs, of people drinking too much, Naimi said.
"This study shows that for reducing alcohol-related problems, effective policies are the solution,"
"This study shows that for reducing alcohol-related problems, effective policies are the solution," Naimi said. But he said that alcohol policy may not sound as exciting as a newly discovered pill or vaccine. "Much more than clinical treatment for alcoholism and educational interventions, alcohol policies are the only thing that can move the needle across the population," Naimi said.
Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.
Image: Adam Berry/Getty Images

Google, Microsoft Lead Campaign to Limit Government Surveillance

Google, Microsoft Lead Campaign to Limit Government SurveillanceSurveillance

Eight technology giants, including Google and Microsoft, have started a public campaign to limit government surveillance of users, The New York Times reports.
The companies — Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, AOL, LinkedIn, and Yahoo — published an open letter in national newspapers and opened a website at reformgovernmentsurveillance.com (which, curiously, doesn't work at the time of this writing).

Google’s Schmidt: NSA Spying on Data Centers Is 'Outrageous'
In the letter, the Reform Government Surveillance group is calling for the U.S. President and Congress to limit surveillance of people, as it "undermines" their freedoms.
"We understand that governments have a duty to protect their citizens. But this summer's revelations highlighted the urgent need to reform government surveillance practices worldwide," the letter said.
“The balance in many countries has tipped too far in favor of the state and away from the rights of the individual — rights that are enshrined in our Constitution. This undermines the freedoms we all cherish.”
The initiative comes after a string of leaks this summer, detailing the NSA's extensive surveillance of users, including spying on data centers of Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and other tech companies.